spacer
 
 

The team based approach to divorce

Both parties can work together to resolve their differences

The parties come to the process voluntarily having specifically chosen this route themselves.

In the traditional approach, you have two lawyers with their clients effectively standing behind them. The two lawyers pit their wits against each other, the aim being to “get their best for their client”.

Certain matters are withheld in order to “protect their client’s case”. It is clearly one brain against the other and it is adversarial and the clients do not have control over the process.

Compare this with Collaborative Law – a frank open process, where there are four people who have come to the process voluntarily, because clients want to keep control of their own destiny.

The lawyers have a duty to their own clients respectively, but they also have a duty to the process and to the family as a whole. The clients come to the Collaborative Law process in a spirit of frankness and openness and the aim from the outset is to achieve the best divorce solution for both of the parties and the whole family. The chances of a more suitable and more satisfactory solution are greatly increased, because in the Collaborative Law process, you now have four brains working on one problem in the spirit of openness and with the sincere wish to achieve the best outcome.

The Collaborative Law approach is based on the fact that the parties will act in their own best interests rather than in a way that would lessen the outcome for the other person if they do not fear retaliation – people make better decisions in the absence of conflict.

Training

Other specialist experts can also be involved

Declaration of Aspirations

Hot Button Issues between the parties

Participation Agreement in Collaborative Law

Tailored divorce solutions

For further advice on your divorce - make an enquiry with us TODAY

 
     

 

Contact us

 

Privacy Statement ©2008 All rights reserved